https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33664 The High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction under sections 35G and 35L to decide the excise duty matter, emphasizing that such matters should be addressed by the Supreme Court. The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition and file an appeal before the appropriate forum, indicating that the issues involved required consideration by the Supreme Court. Parties were instructed to act on a signed copy of the order, with provision for urgent certified copies upon application and compliance with formalities. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33664 The High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction under sections 35G and 35L to decide the excise duty matter, emphasizing that such matters should be addressed by the Supreme Court. The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition and file an appeal before the appropriate forum, indicating that the issues involved required consideration by the Supreme Court. Parties were instructed to act on a signed copy of the order, with provision for urgent certified copies upon application and compliance with formalities. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33664