<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 797 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that service tax was only applicable from 01.06.2007 onwards due to the nature of their contracts. The inclusion of free supply items in tax calculations was deemed impermissible. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the multiple show-cause notices issued by the Department were impermissible, citing legal precedents. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and concluding that the impugned order was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 797 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that service tax was only applicable from 01.06.2007 onwards due to the nature of their contracts. The inclusion of free supply items in tax calculations was deemed impermissible. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the multiple show-cause notices issued by the Department were impermissible, citing legal precedents. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal and concluding that the impugned order was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>