<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 791 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441812</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to doubt regarding the nature of the supplied goods. As there was no intent to evade duty, the proviso to Section 11A(1) did not apply, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were affirmed, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 791 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441812</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to doubt regarding the nature of the supplied goods. As there was no intent to evade duty, the proviso to Section 11A(1) did not apply, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were affirmed, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>