<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441805</link>
    <description>A disciplinary reference based on allegations of fictitious bank accounts and sales tax evasion could not be sustained after the criminal court recorded a clear acquittal on merits for want of evidence on the core allegations. The acquittal was not treated as a benefit-of-doubt result, but as a finding that the foundational facts were not proved. In those circumstances, the disciplinary authority could not rely on the same factual basis without independent material, and the disciplinary recommendation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441805</link>
      <description>A disciplinary reference based on allegations of fictitious bank accounts and sales tax evasion could not be sustained after the criminal court recorded a clear acquittal on merits for want of evidence on the core allegations. The acquittal was not treated as a benefit-of-doubt result, but as a finding that the foundational facts were not proved. In those circumstances, the disciplinary authority could not rely on the same factual basis without independent material, and the disciplinary recommendation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>