<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1657 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309219</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal by CESTAT, directing the return of confiscated brass scrap sale proceeds without interest. Relying on precedent, the Court emphasized that interest is not payable unless explicitly stated in the order. The petitioner&#039;s request for interest was denied, and the opposite parties were instructed to resend the cheque for the amount within one month if not previously accepted. The Court concluded by emphasizing the non-applicability of interest unless specifically directed, in line with the precedent set by Union of India vs. Upper Ganges Sugar and Industries Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1657 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309219</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal by CESTAT, directing the return of confiscated brass scrap sale proceeds without interest. Relying on precedent, the Court emphasized that interest is not payable unless explicitly stated in the order. The petitioner&#039;s request for interest was denied, and the opposite parties were instructed to resend the cheque for the amount within one month if not previously accepted. The Court concluded by emphasizing the non-applicability of interest unless specifically directed, in line with the precedent set by Union of India vs. Upper Ganges Sugar and Industries Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>