<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1450 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of Rs. 35,56,906 under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant financial year, no disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D could be made. The decision was based on the prospective nature of the explanation inserted in Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1450 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of Rs. 35,56,906 under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant financial year, no disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D could be made. The decision was based on the prospective nature of the explanation inserted in Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>