<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1472 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09, dismissing all Revenue appeals. The additions made based on seized documents were deemed unjustified as they lacked proper jurisdictional validity and incriminating evidence directly linked to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision for AY 2009-10, emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction under Section 153C. The order was pronounced on 30.06.2016, allowing the Cross Objections of the assessee and dismissing all Revenue appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1472 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09, dismissing all Revenue appeals. The additions made based on seized documents were deemed unjustified as they lacked proper jurisdictional validity and incriminating evidence directly linked to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision for AY 2009-10, emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction under Section 153C. The order was pronounced on 30.06.2016, allowing the Cross Objections of the assessee and dismissing all Revenue appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>