<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309221</link>
    <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the reopening notice and the rejection of objections but allowed the appellant to raise all relevant contentions during the reassessment proceedings. The assessing officer is required to consider these objections and pass a fresh order, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309221</link>
      <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the reopening notice and the rejection of objections but allowed the appellant to raise all relevant contentions during the reassessment proceedings. The assessing officer is required to consider these objections and pass a fresh order, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>