https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309225 The High Court addressed the divergence of views among statutory bodies regarding the import of genetically modified Soyabeans. The court accepted the Additional Solicitor General's suggestions for testing consignments from an accredited laboratory to ensure accuracy. The court deferred the hearing for further directions. Regarding the competence of laboratory testing, the court refrained from assessing the laboratory's credentials, opting to follow the ASG's recommendations for thorough testing. The court also directed the Port Trust Authority to respond to the issue of withholding a consignment within one week, allowing the Petitioner to challenge the decision if needed. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:49:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309225 The High Court addressed the divergence of views among statutory bodies regarding the import of genetically modified Soyabeans. The court accepted the Additional Solicitor General's suggestions for testing consignments from an accredited laboratory to ensure accuracy. The court deferred the hearing for further directions. Regarding the competence of laboratory testing, the court refrained from assessing the laboratory's credentials, opting to follow the ASG's recommendations for thorough testing. The court also directed the Port Trust Authority to respond to the issue of withholding a consignment within one week, allowing the Petitioner to challenge the decision if needed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309225