<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 289 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33658</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the addition of Rs. 4 lakhs as a non-resident Indian gift in the assessment year 1997-98 under the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of proving the occasion for the gift, the donor&#039;s financial capacity, and the genuineness of the transaction beyond mere identification and banking records. The burden of proof lies with the assessee to establish these crucial aspects to validate a claimed gift under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 289 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33658</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the addition of Rs. 4 lakhs as a non-resident Indian gift in the assessment year 1997-98 under the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of proving the occasion for the gift, the donor&#039;s financial capacity, and the genuineness of the transaction beyond mere identification and banking records. The burden of proof lies with the assessee to establish these crucial aspects to validate a claimed gift under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>