<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 294 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33656</link>
    <description>A delayed refund claim under the Income-tax Act can be examined on merits only after condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b). The decisive test is genuine hardship, not a strict repetition of the Limitation Act standard. On the stated facts, the delay in completing the statutory audit was not attributable to the assessee and the record showed financial hardship, so refusal to condone delay was unsustainable. Once delay is condoned, the refund claim may be processed and scrutinised on merits by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 294 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33656</link>
      <description>A delayed refund claim under the Income-tax Act can be examined on merits only after condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b). The decisive test is genuine hardship, not a strict repetition of the Limitation Act standard. On the stated facts, the delay in completing the statutory audit was not attributable to the assessee and the record showed financial hardship, so refusal to condone delay was unsustainable. Once delay is condoned, the refund claim may be processed and scrutinised on merits by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>