<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 288 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33655</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that rectification under section 154 is limited to clear and self-evident mistakes in the record, not debatable legal issues. The judgment highlighted the importance of distinguishing between rectifiable errors and debatable legal points, referencing relevant case law to support the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 288 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33655</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that rectification under section 154 is limited to clear and self-evident mistakes in the record, not debatable legal issues. The judgment highlighted the importance of distinguishing between rectifiable errors and debatable legal points, referencing relevant case law to support the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>