https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441777 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an Australian company, in a case involving the withholding of permission for their vessel to leave Haldia Dock Complex. The court found the Customs Authorities' refusal based on pending Bills of Entry to be invalid, emphasizing that the petitioner had not violated any laws. It was held that the Customs Authorities must issue the necessary permit for the vessel to depart, respecting the petitioner's rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The court specified that the permit does not allow unloading at the destination port and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441777 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an Australian company, in a case involving the withholding of permission for their vessel to leave Haldia Dock Complex. The court found the Customs Authorities' refusal based on pending Bills of Entry to be invalid, emphasizing that the petitioner had not violated any laws. It was held that the Customs Authorities must issue the necessary permit for the vessel to depart, respecting the petitioner's rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The court specified that the permit does not allow unloading at the destination port and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441777