<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441775</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the suit due to lack of maintainability as the plaintiff, acting as an agent of a disclosed principal, did not have proper authorization to sue on behalf of the principal. Issues regarding the delivery order, collusion between defendants, entitlement to charges and interest were resolved in favor of the defendants, leading to the dismissal of the suit with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:46:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441775</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the suit due to lack of maintainability as the plaintiff, acting as an agent of a disclosed principal, did not have proper authorization to sue on behalf of the principal. Issues regarding the delivery order, collusion between defendants, entitlement to charges and interest were resolved in favor of the defendants, leading to the dismissal of the suit with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>