<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 752 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is not liable to pay Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) on goods imported from China before the issuance of Notification no. 73/2009. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Customs Tariff Act and relevant provisions, concluding that the goods were imported prior to the imposition of ADD. The appeal filed by the department was dismissed, and the appellant was not held responsible for paying the duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 752 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is not liable to pay Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) on goods imported from China before the issuance of Notification no. 73/2009. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Customs Tariff Act and relevant provisions, concluding that the goods were imported prior to the imposition of ADD. The appeal filed by the department was dismissed, and the appellant was not held responsible for paying the duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>