<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 747 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441768</link>
    <description>Where an ex parte direction is challenged on the ground of non-service of notice, the proper course is to seek recall before the same adjudicating authority under the tribunal rules. The procedural scheme under Rules 37, 38, 49 and 105 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 allows the tribunal that passed the order to examine whether notice was duly served or whether sufficient cause prevented appearance, and then decide the recall application by a speaking order after hearing the opposite party. The appellate forum therefore directed the appellant to first invoke the recall mechanism before the adjudicating authority rather than have the merits examined in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 747 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441768</link>
      <description>Where an ex parte direction is challenged on the ground of non-service of notice, the proper course is to seek recall before the same adjudicating authority under the tribunal rules. The procedural scheme under Rules 37, 38, 49 and 105 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 allows the tribunal that passed the order to examine whether notice was duly served or whether sufficient cause prevented appearance, and then decide the recall application by a speaking order after hearing the opposite party. The appellate forum therefore directed the appellant to first invoke the recall mechanism before the adjudicating authority rather than have the merits examined in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>