<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 745 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the demand for the normal time period and setting aside the demand for the extended period. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was modified based on the confusion surrounding the classification of services provided by the appellant and their failure to provide adequate evidence to support their claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 745 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the demand for the normal time period and setting aside the demand for the extended period. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was modified based on the confusion surrounding the classification of services provided by the appellant and their failure to provide adequate evidence to support their claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>