<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 740 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441761</link>
    <description>Eligibility for a later industrial exemption notification depended on the claim having been raised on that basis and on satisfaction of its substantive conditions; a refund originally claimed and sanctioned under an earlier notification could not be converted at the appellate stage into a claim under Notification No. 20/2007-CE. The unit also failed to qualify as a new industrial unit, because mere change in ownership, control, product line, or fresh registration did not establish fresh commencement of commercial production without the prescribed expansion or a genuinely new setup. The denial of the later exemption was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:45:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 740 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441761</link>
      <description>Eligibility for a later industrial exemption notification depended on the claim having been raised on that basis and on satisfaction of its substantive conditions; a refund originally claimed and sanctioned under an earlier notification could not be converted at the appellate stage into a claim under Notification No. 20/2007-CE. The unit also failed to qualify as a new industrial unit, because mere change in ownership, control, product line, or fresh registration did not establish fresh commencement of commercial production without the prescribed expansion or a genuinely new setup. The denial of the later exemption was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>