https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441758 The Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of the proceedings pending at RCT No.09/2018 before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambah, District Morena (M.P.). The petitioner's argument that there was no legally recoverable debt for the issuance of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was rejected. The Court found that the complaint prima facie reflected allegations of a legally recoverable debt, emphasizing that the defense related to partnership dissolution should be addressed during the trial, not at the preliminary stage. Consequently, the Court concluded that the case did not warrant invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441758 The Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of the proceedings pending at RCT No.09/2018 before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambah, District Morena (M.P.). The petitioner's argument that there was no legally recoverable debt for the issuance of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was rejected. The Court found that the complaint prima facie reflected allegations of a legally recoverable debt, emphasizing that the defense related to partnership dissolution should be addressed during the trial, not at the preliminary stage. Consequently, the Court concluded that the case did not warrant invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441758