<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1816 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309195</link>
    <description>Under the India-China tax treaty, remuneration and bonus received by a non-resident employee resident in China for services rendered in China were held not to qualify for exemption under Article 15(1) on the facts found. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same treaty provisions and rejected the claim that the amounts were outside Indian tax net. The bonus component was therefore sustained as taxable in India, and the assessee&#039;s treaty-based exemption claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1816 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309195</link>
      <description>Under the India-China tax treaty, remuneration and bonus received by a non-resident employee resident in China for services rendered in China were held not to qualify for exemption under Article 15(1) on the facts found. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same treaty provisions and rejected the claim that the amounts were outside Indian tax net. The bonus component was therefore sustained as taxable in India, and the assessee&#039;s treaty-based exemption claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>