<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1744 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309194</link>
    <description>Receipts from Indian customers for telecom connectivity services were held not taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services under section 9 and Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA. The Tribunal treated the connectivity arrangement as a standard service facility, not the use of any copyright, patent, process, equipment, or other proprietary right. Although the services involved technical inputs and sophisticated infrastructure, the technology was not made available to the customers, so the treaty definition of fees for technical services was not met. The assessee therefore succeeded on the substantive taxability issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1744 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309194</link>
      <description>Receipts from Indian customers for telecom connectivity services were held not taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services under section 9 and Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA. The Tribunal treated the connectivity arrangement as a standard service facility, not the use of any copyright, patent, process, equipment, or other proprietary right. Although the services involved technical inputs and sophisticated infrastructure, the technology was not made available to the customers, so the treaty definition of fees for technical services was not met. The assessee therefore succeeded on the substantive taxability issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>