https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309204 The High Court of Karnataka addressed urgency in listing the case, appeal against the Single Judge's order, protective orders request, pursuing dual remedies, and non-removal of office objections. The judgment emphasized seeking remedies from the Appellate Tribunal and clarified procedures pending appeal disposal. The appellant was directed to remove specific office objections, with some waived, allowing all contentions to be argued before the Tribunal. en-us Sat, 06 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309204 The High Court of Karnataka addressed urgency in listing the case, appeal against the Single Judge's order, protective orders request, pursuing dual remedies, and non-removal of office objections. The judgment emphasized seeking remedies from the Appellate Tribunal and clarified procedures pending appeal disposal. The appellant was directed to remove specific office objections, with some waived, allowing all contentions to be argued before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Sat, 06 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309204