<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Reopening u/s 147 Challenged; Original Deduction u/s 80IA Was Fully Examined and Allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71491</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - deduction u/s 80IA - The entire claim of the petitioner for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act had been examined and allowed by the assessing officer at the time of framing assessment for the relevant previous years. As such, in our opinion, it could not be claimed by the revenue that the assessee had not fully disclosed the facts. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Reopening u/s 147 Challenged; Original Deduction u/s 80IA Was Fully Examined and Allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71491</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - deduction u/s 80IA - The entire claim of the petitioner for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act had been examined and allowed by the assessing officer at the time of framing assessment for the relevant previous years. As such, in our opinion, it could not be claimed by the revenue that the assessee had not fully disclosed the facts. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>