<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1100 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191</link>
    <description>For quashing under Section 482 CrPC, uncontroverted allegations must, on their face, disclose the essential ingredients of the offences and a prima facie case against each accused. Where the complaint and charge sheet attribute only vague, bald and omnibus allegations, without a definite role against the particular accused, criminal proceedings cannot be sustained at the threshold. The distinction between civil liability and criminal offence must be maintained, and broad assertions of assistance or association are insufficient to continue prosecution. Applying that test, the proceedings were quashed against the appellants for want of a prima facie case, while the case against the remaining accused was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:27:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1100 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191</link>
      <description>For quashing under Section 482 CrPC, uncontroverted allegations must, on their face, disclose the essential ingredients of the offences and a prima facie case against each accused. Where the complaint and charge sheet attribute only vague, bald and omnibus allegations, without a definite role against the particular accused, criminal proceedings cannot be sustained at the threshold. The distinction between civil liability and criminal offence must be maintained, and broad assertions of assistance or association are insufficient to continue prosecution. Applying that test, the proceedings were quashed against the appellants for want of a prima facie case, while the case against the remaining accused was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>