https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals by quashing the proceedings against Accused Nos. 2 and 3, and Accused Nos. 6 to 8. The Court emphasized that the allegations lacked specificity and did not establish a prima facie case against these appellants. The decision highlighted the importance of preventing the abuse of court processes and ensuring the ends of justice are met, as outlined in Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:27:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals by quashing the proceedings against Accused Nos. 2 and 3, and Accused Nos. 6 to 8. The Court emphasized that the allegations lacked specificity and did not establish a prima facie case against these appellants. The decision highlighted the importance of preventing the abuse of court processes and ensuring the ends of justice are met, as outlined in Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309191