<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309189</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the FIR premature as the investigation had not commenced. The Court directed the police to proceed with the investigation, emphasizing that civil court findings are not applicable in criminal petitions for quashing an FIR before the investigation starts. The Supreme Court quashed the impugned order, allowing the appeals and instructing the police to continue with the investigation of the FIR.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 695 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309189</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the FIR premature as the investigation had not commenced. The Court directed the police to proceed with the investigation, emphasizing that civil court findings are not applicable in criminal petitions for quashing an FIR before the investigation starts. The Supreme Court quashed the impugned order, allowing the appeals and instructing the police to continue with the investigation of the FIR.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>