<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1448 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309188</link>
    <description>A complaint alleging breach of factory law requirements on working hours and maintenance of worker records was sufficient to justify investigation. The governing scheme required a notice of working hours for adult workers, a register of adult workers, and consistency between actual work, the displayed notice, and prior entries. At the quashing stage, the complaint had to be read as a whole, and the court would not conduct a detailed factual enquiry or test its genuineness. As the materials did not conclusively show that no offence was made out, the proceedings were not liable to be quashed and investigation was allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1448 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309188</link>
      <description>A complaint alleging breach of factory law requirements on working hours and maintenance of worker records was sufficient to justify investigation. The governing scheme required a notice of working hours for adult workers, a register of adult workers, and consistency between actual work, the displayed notice, and prior entries. At the quashing stage, the complaint had to be read as a whole, and the court would not conduct a detailed factual enquiry or test its genuineness. As the materials did not conclusively show that no offence was made out, the proceedings were not liable to be quashed and investigation was allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>