<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 727 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441748</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated 24th March 2021 and the order dated 13th January 2022. It held these actions as without jurisdiction, illegal, and arbitrary. The court emphasized that reopening an assessment based on a change of opinion is impermissible without a clear indication of the failure to disclose material facts, which was absent in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 727 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441748</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated 24th March 2021 and the order dated 13th January 2022. It held these actions as without jurisdiction, illegal, and arbitrary. The court emphasized that reopening an assessment based on a change of opinion is impermissible without a clear indication of the failure to disclose material facts, which was absent in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>