https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441735 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2015-16 for statistical purposes and allowed the appeal for AY 2016-17. The Tribunal remitted the issue of downward adjustment towards management fees paid to AE back to the AO/TPO for re-examination. It upheld the addition towards billing in excess of revenue, rejected the refund of excess DDT paid, denied the deduction of cess paid in computing business income, and quashed the proceedings for AY 2016-17 due to procedural irregularity. en-us Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441735 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2015-16 for statistical purposes and allowed the appeal for AY 2016-17. The Tribunal remitted the issue of downward adjustment towards management fees paid to AE back to the AO/TPO for re-examination. It upheld the addition towards billing in excess of revenue, rejected the refund of excess DDT paid, denied the deduction of cess paid in computing business income, and quashed the proceedings for AY 2016-17 due to procedural irregularity. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441735