<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 706 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid in 2008. The rejection was deemed unsustainable as the appellant provided evidence of bearing the service tax liability and being the ultimate purchaser of the property. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for refund with interest, granting Rs.55,284 refund from the date of filing the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 706 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for service tax paid in 2008. The rejection was deemed unsustainable as the appellant provided evidence of bearing the service tax liability and being the ultimate purchaser of the property. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for refund with interest, granting Rs.55,284 refund from the date of filing the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>