https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441716 Interference with an acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution is limited to cases where the trial court's view is perverse or not a possible view. On the evidence, the complainant could not identify the date, month or year of the alleged loan, and a direct transaction with the accused remained doubtful despite dealings with her family members. The trial court had reappreciated the evidence, applied the statutory presumption under cheque dishonour law, and found it rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities. No patent illegality, perversity or miscarriage of justice was shown, so leave to appeal was rejected and the acquittal stood. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:14:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441716 Interference with an acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution is limited to cases where the trial court's view is perverse or not a possible view. On the evidence, the complainant could not identify the date, month or year of the alleged loan, and a direct transaction with the accused remained doubtful despite dealings with her family members. The trial court had reappreciated the evidence, applied the statutory presumption under cheque dishonour law, and found it rebutted on a preponderance of probabilities. No patent illegality, perversity or miscarriage of justice was shown, so leave to appeal was rejected and the acquittal stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441716