<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309173</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the petitioners in Spl.C.C. No. 134/2015. The court found that the proceedings were based on discharged scheduled offences, and the appellate tribunal had ordered the release of attached properties. It held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, as no offence was made out against the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309173</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against the petitioners in Spl.C.C. No. 134/2015. The court found that the proceedings were based on discharged scheduled offences, and the appellate tribunal had ordered the release of attached properties. It held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, as no offence was made out against the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>