https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309167 The appeal was listed urgently despite scheduled office objections. Filed against the Single Judge's order, the respondent objected to granting a stay order, citing dual remedies. The Appellate Tribunal's irregular sitting due to Covid-19 was noted, with the appellant seeking interim orders. The Court disposed of the appeal, relegating the appellant to the Tribunal but allowing for protective orders. The respondent was barred from taking precipitative action. Both parties could argue all contentions before the Tribunal. The appellant's counsel was directed to address office objections despite the appeal's disposal. en-us Sat, 06 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309167 The appeal was listed urgently despite scheduled office objections. Filed against the Single Judge's order, the respondent objected to granting a stay order, citing dual remedies. The Appellate Tribunal's irregular sitting due to Covid-19 was noted, with the appellant seeking interim orders. The Court disposed of the appeal, relegating the appellant to the Tribunal but allowing for protective orders. The respondent was barred from taking precipitative action. Both parties could argue all contentions before the Tribunal. The appellant's counsel was directed to address office objections despite the appeal's disposal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Sat, 06 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309167