<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1496 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309174</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order dated 11.01.2021, directing that the trial for money laundering can proceed independently but must await the outcome of the scheduled offence trial. The court emphasized that the trial for the scheduled offence should conclude first to prevent conflicting verdicts. The petitioner&#039;s contention that the trials should be simultaneous was rejected, ensuring a fair trial process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1496 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309174</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order dated 11.01.2021, directing that the trial for money laundering can proceed independently but must await the outcome of the scheduled offence trial. The court emphasized that the trial for the scheduled offence should conclude first to prevent conflicting verdicts. The petitioner&#039;s contention that the trials should be simultaneous was rejected, ensuring a fair trial process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>