<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</link>
    <description>The Court found the petition challenging property tax bills issued by the Panvel Municipal Corporation (PMC) not maintainable, emphasizing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 406 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The Court dismissed the petition, upholding PMC&#039;s actions in levying retrospective property taxes and rejecting allegations of breaching natural justice principles. Additionally, the Court ruled against the locus standi of Petitioner No. 1, a federation of co-operative housing societies, stating that only a person with legal injury can challenge an act in court. The petition was ultimately dismissed, allowing petitioners to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</link>
      <description>The Court found the petition challenging property tax bills issued by the Panvel Municipal Corporation (PMC) not maintainable, emphasizing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 406 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The Court dismissed the petition, upholding PMC&#039;s actions in levying retrospective property taxes and rejecting allegations of breaching natural justice principles. Additionally, the Court ruled against the locus standi of Petitioner No. 1, a federation of co-operative housing societies, stating that only a person with legal injury can challenge an act in court. The petition was ultimately dismissed, allowing petitioners to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>