<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to individual municipal property tax bills was treated as inappropriate where Section 406 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 provides an effective statutory appeal for assessment disputes, including objections based on natural justice, legality of assessment, and retrospective demand. The federation could not maintain a collective challenge because the grievance belonged to the individual societies and it showed no independent legal injury or separate cause of action. Section 150A was also treated as authorising notices for escaped assessment within the prescribed period, so the challenge to retrospective levy was not entertained in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to individual municipal property tax bills was treated as inappropriate where Section 406 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 provides an effective statutory appeal for assessment disputes, including objections based on natural justice, legality of assessment, and retrospective demand. The federation could not maintain a collective challenge because the grievance belonged to the individual societies and it showed no independent legal injury or separate cause of action. Section 150A was also treated as authorising notices for escaped assessment within the prescribed period, so the challenge to retrospective levy was not entertained in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>