<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sufficient Cause holds more weight than length of delay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11729</link>
    <description>Sufficient cause is to be evaluated by reference to whether a taxpayer was prevented from complying with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under the CGST appeal procedure; an enforcement attachment of bank accounts and blockage of input tax credits that disables mobilisation of funds is a relevant ground to condone a short delay in filing, and appellate authorities must consider that factual matrix rather than focus on length of delay alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:49:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sufficient Cause holds more weight than length of delay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11729</link>
      <description>Sufficient cause is to be evaluated by reference to whether a taxpayer was prevented from complying with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under the CGST appeal procedure; an enforcement attachment of bank accounts and blockage of input tax credits that disables mobilisation of funds is a relevant ground to condone a short delay in filing, and appellate authorities must consider that factual matrix rather than focus on length of delay alone.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:49:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>