<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1185 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309162</link>
    <description>Blacklisting of an approved drug-supplying contractor was upheld where the contractual relationship was not governed by any statutory rule requiring disclosure of all underlying material with the show-cause notice. The governing standard was observance of audi alteram partem, and that requirement was satisfied because notice was issued, the reply was submitted, and it was considered by the State Government. Natural justice did not require supply of every supporting document. The order was also not invalid for want of reasons, since the record showed elaborate reasons recorded by the State Government and the High Court found that the order summary reflected them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1185 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309162</link>
      <description>Blacklisting of an approved drug-supplying contractor was upheld where the contractual relationship was not governed by any statutory rule requiring disclosure of all underlying material with the show-cause notice. The governing standard was observance of audi alteram partem, and that requirement was satisfied because notice was issued, the reply was submitted, and it was considered by the State Government. Natural justice did not require supply of every supporting document. The order was also not invalid for want of reasons, since the record showed elaborate reasons recorded by the State Government and the High Court found that the order summary reflected them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>