<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 684 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441705</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the order dated 25.8.2022, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of a three-day delay in depositing balance tax under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The court acknowledged unforeseen circumstances, including the last date falling on a Sunday and a subsequent injury. It directed respondents to accept the tax payment as timely, allowing the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 684 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441705</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the order dated 25.8.2022, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of a three-day delay in depositing balance tax under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The court acknowledged unforeseen circumstances, including the last date falling on a Sunday and a subsequent injury. It directed respondents to accept the tax payment as timely, allowing the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>