<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Confirms Tribunal Ruling: No Income Concealment; Invalid Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Procedural Flaws.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71473</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Concealment of income or not? - validity of notice - Tribunal is correct, both with regard to the fact there had been no concealment, as also concerning the view taken by it that the penalty proceedings did not indicate the limb under which the penalty was sought to be levied on the respondent/assessee. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:26:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Confirms Tribunal Ruling: No Income Concealment; Invalid Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Procedural Flaws.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71473</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Concealment of income or not? - validity of notice - Tribunal is correct, both with regard to the fact there had been no concealment, as also concerning the view taken by it that the penalty proceedings did not indicate the limb under which the penalty was sought to be levied on the respondent/assessee. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:26:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>