<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 675 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2008-09 was invalid due to the lack of specificity in the notice issued. As a result, the penalty of Rs. 15,31,470 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a precise notice specifying the grounds for penalty proceedings, following legal precedents and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 675 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2008-09 was invalid due to the lack of specificity in the notice issued. As a result, the penalty of Rs. 15,31,470 was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a precise notice specifying the grounds for penalty proceedings, following legal precedents and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>