https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441695 The appeal was partly allowed due to the inadequacy of reasons provided for reassessment, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment order as legally flawed. The decision aligned with legal precedents, emphasizing procedural fairness in assessment procedures. The CIT (Appeals) found the reasons for re-opening the assessment to be illegible and non-compliant with legal standards, leading to the rejection of the reassessment. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Aug 2023 00:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441695 The appeal was partly allowed due to the inadequacy of reasons provided for reassessment, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment order as legally flawed. The decision aligned with legal precedents, emphasizing procedural fairness in assessment procedures. The CIT (Appeals) found the reasons for re-opening the assessment to be illegible and non-compliant with legal standards, leading to the rejection of the reassessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441695