<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 659 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of ab initio exemption from Service Tax under Notification No. 12/2013-ST for works contract services, security services, and rent-a-cab services. It held that the services were used for authorized operations, qualifying for exemption, and that the penalty and interest imposed were unjustified due to misinterpretation of the Notification. The appellant&#039;s contentions were upheld, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 22:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 659 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of ab initio exemption from Service Tax under Notification No. 12/2013-ST for works contract services, security services, and rent-a-cab services. It held that the services were used for authorized operations, qualifying for exemption, and that the penalty and interest imposed were unjustified due to misinterpretation of the Notification. The appellant&#039;s contentions were upheld, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>