<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 155 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33630</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed for selling goods at a lower price to another unit of their company. The Tribunal considered the pricing procedure justified, emphasizing the non-related status of the other unit and the availability of duty credit between units. It rejected the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; conclusion of intentional duty evasion, noting the earlier show cause notice and revenue-neutral situation. The judgment underscored the importance of interpreting related persons in pricing excisable goods and ensuring fairness in duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 155 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33630</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed for selling goods at a lower price to another unit of their company. The Tribunal considered the pricing procedure justified, emphasizing the non-related status of the other unit and the availability of duty credit between units. It rejected the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; conclusion of intentional duty evasion, noting the earlier show cause notice and revenue-neutral situation. The judgment underscored the importance of interpreting related persons in pricing excisable goods and ensuring fairness in duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>