<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 658 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming duty demand and penalty on an Appellant, a 100% EOU manufacturing Polyester fabrics, for alleged diversion of goods. The judgment held that duty should only be imposed on finished goods, not raw materials, emphasizing proper consideration of evidence and certificates. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision, directing a personal hearing for the Appellant within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 22:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 658 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming duty demand and penalty on an Appellant, a 100% EOU manufacturing Polyester fabrics, for alleged diversion of goods. The judgment held that duty should only be imposed on finished goods, not raw materials, emphasizing proper consideration of evidence and certificates. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision, directing a personal hearing for the Appellant within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>