<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 656 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, ruling that no duty could be demanded during the period when Circular No. 924/14/2010-CX classified the goods under Chapter Heading 8437. Penalties were not imposed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Other issues like time-bar, cum-duty price, and Cenvat credit were not addressed, remaining open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 22:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 656 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, ruling that no duty could be demanded during the period when Circular No. 924/14/2010-CX classified the goods under Chapter Heading 8437. Penalties were not imposed, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Other issues like time-bar, cum-duty price, and Cenvat credit were not addressed, remaining open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>