<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 655 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that despite discrepancies in invoice addresses, the appellant correctly availed cenvat credit as goods were received and used at the registered factory location. The appellant&#039;s utilization of raw materials for manufacturing final products on which duty was paid justified the credit availed. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 20:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 655 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that despite discrepancies in invoice addresses, the appellant correctly availed cenvat credit as goods were received and used at the registered factory location. The appellant&#039;s utilization of raw materials for manufacturing final products on which duty was paid justified the credit availed. The impugned order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>