<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 786 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309142</link>
    <description>The court upheld the acquittal of the accused in an appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found material alterations in the cheques, rendering them void under Section 87 of the Act. Emphasizing the significance of legal provisions and evidence, the court dismissed the appeal, underscoring the importance of compliance with statutory requirements in cases involving dishonored cheques.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 12:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 786 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309142</link>
      <description>The court upheld the acquittal of the accused in an appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found material alterations in the cheques, rendering them void under Section 87 of the Act. Emphasizing the significance of legal provisions and evidence, the court dismissed the appeal, underscoring the importance of compliance with statutory requirements in cases involving dishonored cheques.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>