<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1422 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309129</link>
    <description>A court should not stay a criminal investigation in proceedings under Article 226 or Section 482 CrPC except in the rarest of rare cases. Applying the caution mandated in Neeharika Infrastructure, the Supreme Court found that the High Court had wrongly granted interim protection staying further investigation and criminal proceedings despite an earlier order setting aside similar relief in the same matters. The interim order was therefore vacated, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1422 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309129</link>
      <description>A court should not stay a criminal investigation in proceedings under Article 226 or Section 482 CrPC except in the rarest of rare cases. Applying the caution mandated in Neeharika Infrastructure, the Supreme Court found that the High Court had wrongly granted interim protection staying further investigation and criminal proceedings despite an earlier order setting aside similar relief in the same matters. The interim order was therefore vacated, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>