https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33621 The court upheld the initiation notice, preliminary findings, and imposition of provisional safeguard duty, dismissing the writ petitions. It found the Director General acted within his powers, ensuring due process and adequate protection of the petitioners' rights during the final determination process. Judicial intervention in economic matters was cautioned against, emphasizing deference to specialized agencies in complex decision-making processes. en-us Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33621 The court upheld the initiation notice, preliminary findings, and imposition of provisional safeguard duty, dismissing the writ petitions. It found the Director General acted within his powers, ensuring due process and adequate protection of the petitioners' rights during the final determination process. Judicial intervention in economic matters was cautioned against, emphasizing deference to specialized agencies in complex decision-making processes. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33621