https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441641 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, determining that the merger between the two cinema companies constituted a combination under the Competition Act, 2002, rather than an anti-competitive agreement. It found no prima facie case under Sections 3 or 4, as the merger did not result in an appreciable adverse effect on competition. The Tribunal noted that while potential dominance was a concern, it did not warrant action without evidence of abusive conduct. Consequently, the application alleging contravention of Section 3(1) was deemed not maintainable. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441641 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, determining that the merger between the two cinema companies constituted a combination under the Competition Act, 2002, rather than an anti-competitive agreement. It found no prima facie case under Sections 3 or 4, as the merger did not result in an appreciable adverse effect on competition. The Tribunal noted that while potential dominance was a concern, it did not warrant action without evidence of abusive conduct. Consequently, the application alleging contravention of Section 3(1) was deemed not maintainable. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441641