<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 616 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441637</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period for 90 days for re-publication of Form-G to maximize the value of the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assets. The Tribunal supported the Committee of Creditors&#039; decision based on a higher bid received, dismissing the Appellant&#039;s arguments against the extension. Additionally, the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s revised Resolution Plan was deemed valid as the CoC had the authority to seek higher bids and re-publish Form-G. The Appellant&#039;s claim of breach of confidentiality by the Resolution Professional was dismissed for lack of merit, and the Tribunal affirmed the NCLT&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 616 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441637</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period for 90 days for re-publication of Form-G to maximize the value of the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assets. The Tribunal supported the Committee of Creditors&#039; decision based on a higher bid received, dismissing the Appellant&#039;s arguments against the extension. Additionally, the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s revised Resolution Plan was deemed valid as the CoC had the authority to seek higher bids and re-publish Form-G. The Appellant&#039;s claim of breach of confidentiality by the Resolution Professional was dismissed for lack of merit, and the Tribunal affirmed the NCLT&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>